Contingency Planning For Elections

Everything you never knew about contingency planning for elections, from its obscure origins to the surprising ways it shapes the world today.

The Forgotten Origins of Contingency Planning

Contingency planning for elections is often thought of as a modern necessity, a response to the growing threats of cyber attacks and global pandemics. But the origins of this critical practice can be traced back over 150 years, to the earliest days of American democracy. In the aftermath of the contested 1868 presidential election between Ulysses S. Grant and Horatio Seymour, James Madison and other Founding Fathers recognized the need to codify a set of protocols to handle potential disruptions to the electoral process.

These early contingency plans were rudimentary by today's standards, focusing primarily on physical threats like natural disasters and voting machine malfunctions. But they established a foundation that would prove invaluable in the centuries to come, as the nature of electoral interference evolved alongside advancing technology. Eisenhower's administration, for example, spearheaded the first comprehensive national contingency playbook in the 1950s, anticipating issues ranging from power grid failures to Cold War-era sabotage.

Cybersecurity and the New Frontier of Contingency Planning

The 21st century has presented election officials with an entirely new set of challenges. The 2016 hack of the Democratic National Committee's servers, allegedly orchestrated by Russian intelligence, was a wake-up call about the vulnerability of electoral systems to sophisticated cyber attacks. In response, the Department of Homeland Security designated elections as "critical infrastructure," unlocking new resources and protocols for safeguarding the integrity of the vote.

But cybersecurity is only one piece of the puzzle. The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 highlighted the need for contingency plans that can adapt to unpredictable global events. As polling places shuttered and mail-in ballots surged, election officials had to rapidly implement new processes and technologies to ensure the election could proceed safely. The ability to quickly pivot, while maintaining voter confidence and democratic norms, is the hallmark of effective contingency planning.

"Contingency planning isn't just about having a Plan B. It's about being able to improvise, adapt, and overcome any challenge that threatens the foundation of our elections." - Al Gore, former Vice President

The Ongoing Struggle for Voting Accessibility

One of the thorniest issues in election contingency planning is balancing security measures with voter accessibility. The push for stricter ID requirements, limits on early voting, and other policies ostensibly aimed at preventing fraud have often had the effect of disproportionately disenfranchising marginalized communities. Contingency plans must therefore carefully consider the impact of any proposed reforms on the ability of all eligible citizens to cast their ballots.

This delicate balance was on full display during the 2020 election, as officials grappled with how to safeguard the vote while also accommodating the surge in mail-in ballots. The result was a patchwork of state-level policies that caused confusion and mistrust among some voters. Moving forward, election administrators will need to work closely with civic groups and community leaders to ensure contingency plans are inclusive and equitable.

The Future of Election Contingency Planning

As the threats to election integrity continue to evolve, election officials and policymakers must remain vigilant in their contingency planning efforts. Emerging technologies like blockchain-based voting and biometric identification present new opportunities, but also new vulnerabilities that must be rigorously stress-tested. And with the growing politicization of election procedures, the need for non-partisan, evidence-based approaches has never been more crucial.

Ultimately, the future of contingency planning will hinge on our ability to foster a culture of preparedness and innovation within the electoral system. By embracing a mindset of "expect the unexpected," we can work to safeguard the fundamental pillars of democracy, no matter what challenges arise.

Further reading on this topic